Why Some “Copycat” Companies Succeed Despite Competition

Even with existing ideas, execution beats originality in many real-world cases. Here’s why they can succeed:

1. Better Execution

  • Faster, smoother UX (e.g. Zoom vs. Skype)
  • Simpler onboarding, better customer support, cleaner UI
  • Example: Canva wasn’t the first online design tool, but made design easy for non-designers.

2. Better Timing

  • Market maturity matters. Early entrants often educate the market, latecomers monetize it.
  • Example: Facebook wasn’t the first social network, but launched when broadband and college email access became common.

3. Focused Niche / Geography

  • Localisation or niche adaptation often wins.
  • Example: Ola in India (Uber clone), or Coupang in South Korea (Amazon model).
  • A company that copies an idea and focuses on a neglected audience can dominate.

4. Superior Distribution / Growth Engine

  • Better SEO, viral loops, referral systems.
  • Example: TikTok (ByteDance) cracked short-form video virality far better than Vine did.

5. Brand Positioning or Pricing

  • Slight tweaks in value prop (e.g. “ethical”, “cheaper”, “premium”) can shift the whole market.
  • Example: Trader Joe’s and Aldi – same owners, very different market positioning.

Why VCs Often Don’t Like “Copycat” Models

They are playing a different game:

1. VCs Seek Asymmetric Upside

  • They want outlier outcomes (10x+ returns). A crowded idea with thin margins or low moat isn’t likely to provide that.
  • Hence the obsession with “moat”, IP, network effects, and scalability.

2. Replicability = Low Defensibility

  • If anyone can copy you, you’re replaceable.
  • VCs ask: what protects you once others see you’re profitable?

3. Fund Size Constraints

  • Large funds need startups that can become billion-dollar companies. A modest copycat doing £10M/year isn’t enough.